Home Learn LBP & Regulation Essential anchors for bottom plates

August 2018

Essential anchors for bottom plates

17 Jul 2018, LBP & Regulation, Prove Your Know How

Anchors that fix bottom plates to concrete slab-on-ground floors are an essential component of timber frame construction as they secure the upper building structure to the foundation

They must be able to withstand forces in three directions – uplift (tension), along the wall (in-plane shear) and across the wall (out-of-plane shear).

Two options for fixing bottom plates

Section 7 of NZS 3604:2011 Timber-framed buildings provides two options for fixing bottom plates to concrete floor slabs:

  • Cast-in anchors consisting of M12 bolts and either 50x50x3mm square washers or 55 x 3mm round washers that are cast into the concrete; or
  • Tested proprietary anchors that are inserted in the concrete once it has sufficiently cured.

A range of proprietary anchors are available, including anchors screwed into pre-drilled holes, anchors chemically grouted into pre-drilled holes, expanding or wedge anchors.

The focus here is on screw-type anchors inserted into pre-drilled holes.

Anchors screwed into pre-drilled holes

Screw-type anchors were initially designed as removable fasteners for fixing plant and machinery to concrete walls and floors. In residential and commercial construction they have become a popular option when inserted into pre-drilled holes, for fixing timber bottom plates to concrete floor slabs.

Screw-type anchors offer some advantages over other types of proprietary anchors as they are:

  • Quick and easy to install – drill a hole in the correct location in the concrete floor, align the timber framing and install the screw anchor using either a power driver or manual socket or wrench.
  • Easily removed.
  • Less likely to cause damage to the concrete as they do not have an expanding wedge or sleeve that applies an expansion force.

A few things to consider

There are some considerations if you are going to install screw-type anchors into concrete foundations:

  1. Have the anchors been tested to demonstrate they have the required capacity to meet the requirements of NZS 3604:2011?

Anchor capacity must meet the performance criteria for external and internal walls described in NZS 3604:2011 paragraphs 7.5.12.3 and 7.5.12.4. These are shown below in Table 1.

  1. Can screw-type anchors be used to hold down walls containing bracing?

Proprietary anchors may be used as hold-downs for walls containing bracing but require additional uplift capacity depending on the bracing unit (BU) ratings:

  • 150BUs/m – 15kN uplift fixings
  • 120BUs/m – 12kN uplift fixings.

Proprietary anchors should also have test results to demonstrate that they have been tested and meet the NZS 3604: 2011 requirements for their intended use.

  1. Can adequate cover to the anchor be achieved, particularly in exposure zone D (as described in NZS 3604:2011)?
    Figures 1 (main picture) and 2 provide two details of how the maximum cover can be achieved.

Edge distances and spacings

NZS 3604:2011 does not give edge distance dimensions for proprietary anchors as the dimensions depend on the particular product and the slab edge detail, frame width, concrete strength and load.

Anchor spacings for proprietary anchors are given in the Standard as:

  • 900mm centres maximum for in-situ concrete floor slabs.
  • 600mm centres maximum where the slab edges are formed using concrete masonry header blocks.
  • No more than 150mm from each end of every plate.

Durability depends on use

The protection required for all structural fixings for all zones in closed environments may be mild steel (ie, uncoated and non-galvanised) in accordance with NZS 3604:2011 Table 4.1. However, the Standard states that where fixings are fixed into timber treated with a copper-based preservative, the fixings in closed environments should be at least hot-dipped, galvanised steel.

This article first appeared in Codewords – Issue 84


Register to earn LBP Points Sign in

7 Comments

  1. zzycgq2008@live.cn says:

    good

  2. jay@jphomesnz.co.nz says:

    That was good

  3. mingke1220@gmail.com says:

    Good

  4. Khan_gordon@hotmail.com says:

    Q2?

    1. Meagan Robertson says:

      Hi there,

      The answer is a bit tricky but can be found in the text. It is highlighted in this bullet point.

      – less likely to cause damage to the concrete as they do not have an expanding wedge or sleeve that applies an expansion force.

      Hope this helps,
      The Under Construction team

  5. dpmal@slingshot.co.nz says:

    good

  6. jimpember51@gmail.com says:

    all good

Leave a Reply